Most Recent Comments

1) David Dunn [by David Dunn on October 20, 2006]
This legislation is contrary to American values. "The care of human life and happiness and not their destruction is the only legitimate object of good government." - Thomas Jefferson

This legislation is designed to impose an undue economic hardship on a household because a legislator doesn't like the genitalia of the household members.

The federal income tax law allows for a head of household that imposes no requirement for a blood relationship.

This legislation is an attempt to use government to impose a religious value on others who may not share the same values.

This legislation needs to be soundly defeated.
Reply

2) state government activist [by Anonymous Citizen on October 18, 2006]
Normally don't agree with Stan Lee on anything, but there's a first time for everything.

Allowing law to be used to give such an immoral arrangement access to all tax supported services is absolutely against Kentucky taxpayers' use of their tax dollars!

Such legislation in place keeps this from happening---protectiing Kentucky taxpayers from allowing opening up Kentucky's tax supported services to such immorally alignned couples.

In addition such legislation disallows perpetuation of immoral behavior by cutting off access to tax supported services.

Amen!

Reply

3) Coding Hate [by Anonymous Citizen on October 18, 2006]
Stop looking past your own prejudices. Every single person in America deserves basic rights such as healthcare, regardless of creed, race, religion, or sexual orientation.
Reply

View Full Conversation